Financial Modelling

Series B
Financial Model

By Series B, you have real data. Series B investors will use that data to test whether your Series A assumptions were right — and whether the new model is any more credible. A business that cannot show improving capital efficiency will struggle to close on its own terms.

Consult EFC builds Series B financial models that demonstrate the evolution from Series A — showing improving unit economics, multi-segment revenue architecture, clear path to profitability, and international expansion modelling. Built personally by Kishen Patel, ICAEW ACA.

ICAEW Regulated Multi-Segment Revenue Architecture Path to Profitability International Expansion Modelling Fixed Fee
£10m–£30m
Typical Series B raise range
NRR 110%+
What Series B investors expect for B2B SaaS
ICAEW
Regulated & indemnified
Kish Patel ACA

Get your model scoped

Kish reviews every enquiry personally

No obligation • Response within one working day

What Is Included

Built for the complexity that Series B demands

Series B investors are not just betting on growth — they are assessing whether the unit economics improve at scale, whether operational leverage is real, and whether international expansion will erode or expand margins.

Cohort Revenue Architecture

Multi-vintage cohort model showing ARR expansion, contraction, and churn by customer cohort. Gross and net revenue retention visible by segment — the primary metric Series B investors interrogate.

Multi-Segment P&L

Separate revenue and margin waterfall by product line, geography, or customer segment. Consolidated view with segment bridges — so investors can see where growth is coming from and where margins are being compressed.

Path to Profitability

Clear EBITDA bridge showing when the business reaches cash-flow breakeven under each scenario. Contribution margin by segment, fixed cost leverage analysis, and gross margin expansion drivers.

International Expansion Model

Separate market entry economics — local CAC, payback curves, and margin structure — modelled by geography. Shows how and when each new market becomes contribution-positive.

Headcount & Operational Leverage

Headcount plan linked to revenue milestones, showing how gross margin and EBITDA margin evolve as fixed costs are leveraged across a larger revenue base.

Series A vs Series B Bridge

A retrospective analysis showing how actual metrics compare to Series A model assumptions — and why the Series B model is more credible. The single most powerful trust-building element in a sophisticated investor process.

Series B vs Series A

What changes at Series B — and why it matters for the model

Series B is a different conversation from Series A in three material ways. Understanding those differences is what separates a model that closes a deal from one that raises questions.

Investors expect proof, not projection

By Series B you have 18 to 24 months of post-Series A data. Investors will compare your Series A model to your actual performance line by line. The quality of your Series A assumptions determines the credibility of your Series B projections.

Capital efficiency is scrutinised harder

Series B investors will calculate how much ARR growth was produced per pound of Series A capital deployed. If the answer is worse than the Series A model implied, the question is why — and whether Series B capital will be deployed any more efficiently.

Path to profitability is now a real question

At Series A, "path to profitability" is a conceptual discussion. At Series B, investors want to see the specific model assumptions that produce EBITDA breakeven — and whether those assumptions are realistic given the business's cost structure.

Series B investor checklist

NRR by customer cohort — is the base expanding or contracting?
CAC payback improving as brand and distribution matures
Gross margin evolution — is scale producing operating leverage?
Multi-segment P&L — which product or geography is growing fastest?
International unit economics modelled separately from domestic
EBITDA breakeven with specific assumption bridge
Use of proceeds tied to specific strategic milestones
Series A actual vs model comparison
Rule of 40 trajectory across the model period

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

A Series B financial model must demonstrate that Series A capital was deployed as planned and that the resulting metrics — CAC efficiency, NRR, gross margin — support the new model. It typically needs to model multiple revenue lines or geographies with separate economics, and Series B investors focus heavily on path to profitability and EBITDA margins alongside growth.
Series B investors focus on capital efficiency — whether the business is getting more efficient at acquiring and retaining customers as it scales. They expect NRR above 110% for B2B SaaS, improving CAC payback, and a clear path to EBITDA positivity. They also examine international expansion economics separately.
Series B use-of-proceeds should be broken down by strategic initiative rather than cost category. Investors want to see how capital is allocated between market entry, product expansion, and sales capacity — and what specific metric milestone each allocation is designed to achieve.

Get Started

Tell us about your Series B raise

Kish will review your situation personally and respond within one working day.

No obligation • ICAEW Regulated

Kish Patel ACA

Kish Patel ACA

ICAEW Chartered Accountant • Founder, Consult EFC

"Series B investors have seen hundreds of models. The ones that close deals are not the most optimistic — they are the ones that answer every question before it is asked."

ICAEW Regulated

Professionally indemnified and bound by the ICAEW Code of Ethics on every engagement.

Fixed Fee — Agreed Upfront

Full cost confirmed before work starts. No hourly billing, no scope creep.

Kish Leads Every Engagement

No junior analysts. The person who scopes the model builds and delivers it.

Prefer to book a call directly?

Book via Calendly